Written in EnglishRead online
Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||Robert E. French ; with a foreword by David McGraw.|
|LC Classifications||BJ1500.C63 F74 2009|
|The Physical Object|
|LC Control Number||2009005210|
Download Ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective
Get this from a library. Ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective: a study in philosophical ethics.
[Robert E French] -- "This book presents an account of ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective where a fairness constraint is placed on a utilitarian ethical theory.
The work begins by analyzing both. Get this from a library. Ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective: a study in philosophical ethics. [Robert E French] -- This book presents an account of ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective where a fairness constraint is placed on a utilitarian ethical theory.
The work begins by analyzing both. This book presents an account of ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective where a fairness constraint is placed on a utilitarian ethical theory. The work begins by analyzing both the perspective and descriptive content and the concepts of ‘what is fair’ and ‘what is best.’ The concept of ‘fairness’ is then analyzed along completely consequentialist lines and a Author: French, Robert.
Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do.
Two examples of consequentialism are utilitarianism and hedonism. [ ]. Question: "What is consequentialist ethics / consequentialism?" Answer: Consequentialism is a theory of normative ethics. It holds that an act is only moral or ethical if it results in a good conclusion.
Ethical Decision-Making from a Consequentialist Perspective: A Study in Philosophical Ethics [French, Robert E., McGraw, David] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Ethical Decision-Making from a Consequentialist Perspective: A Study in Philosophical EthicsAuthor: Robert E.
French. Postmodern ethics has neither a recipe for ethical decision-making nor any specific rules or principles that must always be followed.
Rather (following Gustafson, ), it takes a holistic approach, focuses on examples rather than principles, and sees ethical reasoning as a constant learning process (preliminary character of reasoning). Consequentialist Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics d,DepartmentofEconomics Suppose that a social behaviour norm speciﬁes ethical decisions Ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective book all decision nodes The ﬁrst part of this paper is a review of the consequentialist approach to BayesianFile Size: KB.
A Model of Ethical Decision Making From a Multicultural Perspective Article in Counseling and values 49(3) April with Reads How we measure 'reads'. b egins to apply the consequentialist decision theory of the ﬁrst part of the pap er to ethical decision problems concerning a society of individuals.
T o do so it in tro duces personal. Perspective approaches to ethical decision making in business Focus on consequences (consequentialist theories) Focus on duties, obligations, principals (deontological theories).
Deontology's Foil: Consequentialism. Because deontological Ethical decision-making from a consequentialist perspective book are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to.
Most people would say there is more good than bad in that decision, so it is ethical, from a consequentialist, or teleological, ethics perspective.
Non-Consequentialist Ethics. Kant and Deontological Theory Essay Words | 5 Pages. Kant and Deontological Theory Immanuel Kant was a moral philosopher. His theory, better known as deontological theory, holds that intent, reason, rationality, and good will are motivating factors in the ethical decision making process.
In particular, the contributors use consequentialist theory to address central questions in environmental ethics, such as questions about what kinds of things have value; about decision-making in light of the long-term, intergenerational nature of environmental issues; and about the role that a state’s being natural should play in ethical.
In particular, the contributors use consequentialist theory to address central questions in environmental ethics, such as questions about what kinds of things have value; about decision-making in light of the long-term, intergenerational nature of environmental issues; and about the role that a state’s being natural should play in ethical Format: Hardcover.
Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the act. Deontology Probably the most complex of all the ethical systems we look at here is Kantian logic, which is a deontological theory.
The word deontology comes from the Greek word deon, meaning “obligation” or “duty.”It is an ethical system primarily concerned with one’s : Steve McCartney, Rick Parent, McCartney, Steve.
Core Ethical Reasoning and Analysis. Utilitarianism is a type of consequentialist perspective. Actions. Deontologists judge the rightness purely on the action itself. Duty-based and rights-based perspectives fall into this category.
For a positive example of ethical decision making, listen or read the transcript of this interview Author: Core Curriculum. Deontological ethical decision making: Deontological (obligation based) morals are concerned with what individuals do, not with the outcomes of their activities.
Make the best decision. Do it in light of the fact that it’s the correct thing to do. Don't do wrong things. Dodge them in light of the fact that they are incorrect. Under this manifestation of ethics you can't defend an activity. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes.
It is a form of consequentialism. Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. It is the only moral framework that. The case of the Ford Pinto explosions that were caused by a defective gas tank design provides an interesting case study into approaches to ethical decision making.
There are three possible approaches to make when making ethical decisions; a consequentialist approach, a deontological approach and a psychological approach. The article discusses each approach in relation to the Ford Pinto case.
The first documentary movie on CCP virus, Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus - Duration: NTD Recommended for you. JASON DOUGLAS Philosophical Approach to Ethical Decision Making Tasha L.
Thomas 01/22/ Abstract Ethics is the branch of philosophy that examines questions of morality, or right and wrong. In this paper we will discuss the philosophical approaches used in ethical decision two approaches that will be elaborated on are the utilitarian approach and the universal.
Ethical Decision Making. From a non-consequentialist perspective, if the therapist is deemed as a good and well-intended individual (of course, who is sitting in judgment determines the extent to which the therapist meets this criterion), then goodness is affirmed.
However, if the therapist's concern with the alliance as the basis for. Non-consequentialist theories, which tend to be broadly concerned with the intentions of the person making ethical decisions about particular actions; and 3) Agent-centered theories, which, unlike consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories, are more.
Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action. One of the most well known forms of consequentialism is utilitarianism which was first proposed by Jeremy Bentham and his mentee J.S.
Mill. This is about comparing the utility of the consequences of an action. J.S. Mill proposes this as "the greatest happiness for the. Chapter 1: Almost Ethical Edit. The opening of the book is a real-world example of some psychiatrists with prestigious credentials who published an article about a drug but failed to disclose their relationship with drug that example as a background Howard and Korver (H&k) listed some of the pragmatic consequences of unethical behavior.
In particular, the contributors use consequentialist theory to address central questions in environmental ethics, such as questions about what kinds of things have value; about decision-making in light of the long-term, intergenerational nature of environmental issues; and about the role that a state's being natural should play in ethical.
In 's introductory course on ethical decision making: Ethical Decision Making: A Primer for Mental Health Clinicians, a six-stage model was introduced that integrated and expanded on many of the components of the ethical decision making models presented so.
CONSEQUENTIALIST ETHICAL THEORIES A (PURELY) CONSEQUENTIALIST Ethical Theory is a general normative theory that bases the moral evaluation of acts, rules, institutions, etc.
solely on the goodness of their consequences, where the standard of goodness employed is. Consequentialism, In ethics, the doctrine that actions should be judged right or wrong on the basis of their simplest form of consequentialism is classical (or hedonistic) utilitarianism, which asserts that an action is right or wrong according to whether it maximizes the net balance of pleasure over pain in the consequentialism of G.E.
Moore, known as “ ideal. Explore the consequentialist theories of ethical egoism and utilitarianism and test your understanding with a brief quiz.
Consequentialism When you were a child, your parents tried to teach you. We can illustrate the difference by considering an example such as child labour.
Imagine you run a factory in a very poor country and a child comes to your door and asks for a job. A deontologist (someone who believes in absolute duties) might say.
This is due to the fact that this is a duty based ethical decision-making approach, which basically defines a decision that is made based upon an individual's duty-based moral obligation to adhere to recognize societal standards, as being ethical or deontological. Teleological, Deontological and Virtue Ethics Theories Reconciled in the Context of Traditional Economic Decision Making Ilona Baumane-Vitolinaa*, Igo Calsa, Erika Sumiloa aUniversity of Latvia, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Riga, Latvia Abstract This article examines the most prominent ethical theories from the view Cited by: 1.
Consequentialism I Consequentialism in ethics is the view that whether or not an action is good or bad depends solely on what e ects that action has on the world. I \The greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people" I The Greatest Happiness Principle \actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as.
There is a definite contrast between utilitarianism, even Mill’s version, and Kant’s system of ethics, known as deontology, in which duty, obligation, and good will are of the highest importance. (The word is derived from the Greek deon, meaning duty, and logos again, here meaning organization for the purpose of : OpenStax.
Ethical Principles and Information Professionals: Theory, Practice and Education Ethical decision-making is considered a peculiarly human activity due to our ability to reason, to rationalise and to analyse what we do, to see ourselves viewpoints adopted, and the.
Philosophers. John Locke () Immanuel Kant () The three schools of ethics are tools for thinking about morality. Seldom do we use one approach exclusively. Viewed from a consequentialist perspective, one of the primary purposes of an organizational ethics program is to ensure that the organization is not penalized for the actions of its individual employees and to avoid the bad consequences that might result from such actions (e.g., fines, lawsuits, etc).Utilitarianism holds that we should judge the merit of an act by its foreseeable consequences.
Actions are good when they produce benefit or prevent harm. There are two divisions: Act Utilitarianism – The ethical merit of an act is judged by the immediate and direct consequences of the action.; Rule Utilitarianism – The ethical merit of an act is judged in terms of what the consequences of.NON-CONSEQUENTIALISM AND UNIVERSALIZABILITY relationships, of the kind that the non-consequentialist prescribes, or they open the question as to what day-to-day habits of decision-making ought to be cultivated by agents.6 It does not entail, for example, that the agent ought.